Contract search
We search by text, meaning, counterparty, dates, amounts, clauses, appendices, and related files.
Legal and operations teams find the right clause faster and can see which file it came from.
AI for Documents · Kazakhstan
We build AI search and assistants for contracts, PDFs, instructions, spreadsheets, and internal files. The system can find a clause, compare versions, extract fields, prepare a draft, or answer from the knowledge base. Legally important conclusions and risky decisions stay with a person.
— 01 / TASKS
Buyers usually come here when documents have started slowing work down: files live in different places, versions have nearly identical names, staff search through private folders, and manual data extraction eats hours.
We search by text, meaning, counterparty, dates, amounts, clauses, appendices, and related files.
Legal and operations teams find the right clause faster and can see which file it came from.
We help show what changed between versions of a contract, policy, instruction, or commercial proposal.
Approval work depends less on reading two similar files side by side.
We connect policies, procedures, FAQ, spreadsheets, and internal pages so employees can ask in plain language.
The team gets an answer with a source instead of a colleague trying to remember where something was written.
We extract company details, dates, amounts, parties, statuses, numbers, payment terms, and other fields into a table or CRM.
Manual copying goes down, while uncertain fields can be sent to a person for review.
AI prepares a first version of a letter, response, note, or document using a template and retrieved material.
Staff start from a draft they can check instead of a blank page.
We build an interface where users can ask documents questions, see sources, filter by section, and respect access rules.
Internal knowledge becomes a working tool instead of a file warehouse.
— 02 / FIT
Custom development is useful when an off-the-shelf tool does not understand your data, access rules, systems, or responsibility boundaries.
— 03 / PROCESS
We inspect real tickets, documents, spreadsheets, and access rules.
We define where AI replies, where it acts, and where a human stays in the loop.
We build a working first version against samples from your actual workflow.
We connect CRM, messengers, databases, documents, or internal APIs.
We test on real dialogs, questions, and files, not just friendly demo prompts.
We put the system into work with clear roles, logs, and control points.
We review wrong answers, edge cases, escalations, and user behavior.
We improve scenarios after launch, once real usage starts showing the truth.
— 04 / WORK
These projects are close in shape: integrations, knowledge, operations, support, or product AI logic.
An AI assistant for automotive operations: cars, service, orders, part compatibility, and internal knowledge across several data sources.
An AI HR agent for a Kazakhstani retail chain: candidate screening, internal knowledge, vacancy fit, and recruiter workflows.
— 05 / INTEGRATIONS
Before the build, we check which systems expose APIs, where data lives, and who will keep it current.
— 06 / DATA
We design the architecture around your requirements: roles, access rules, action logs, source restrictions, and answer checks
— 07 / TIMELINE
2-3 business days when sample data and a process owner are available.
1-2 weeks for a narrow scenario with a limited integration set.
3-6 weeks when the system needs real integrations and team access.
Timeline depends on integrations, data quality, and security requirements.
— 08 / PRICING
Pricing depends on integrations, data quality, access roles, testing scope, and infrastructure requirements. Each stage is paid separately.
A paid review of the task, data, risks, and first sensible scope.
We test the scenario on a small data set before debating it in theory.
We build a working version with UI, integrations, and basic quality control.
We harden the system for access control, logs, operations, and support.
We monitor quality, fix issues, and add new scenarios after launch.
— 09 / azamat.ai
— 09 / FAQ
Yes. AI can find clauses, compare versions, extract fields, and prepare a summary. Legal judgment, risk assessment, and final approval should stay with a lawyer or responsible employee.
It is safer to treat the output as a draft analysis. The model can flag a risk and show the source, but it should not be the final authority for legally important decisions.
We extract text first, run OCR for scans when needed, split documents into chunks, build an index, and test quality on real questions. Bad scans need a separate OCR check.
Yes. Sources can be separated by role, department, project, or document type. Important access can be logged so the company knows who queried what.
The team needs a source of truth: where the current version lives, how archives are marked, and who owns updates. Without that, AI only exposes the mess faster.
— 10 / LINKS
Send the workflow, the data sources, and the systems you need connected. We will estimate a practical first stage without hand-waving.