Support in WhatsApp and Telegram
An agent handles questions in Kazakh, Russian, English, and mixed messages.
Common replies go out faster, while sensitive cases reach an operator with context.
AI development · Kazakhstan
We design and ship AI agents, RAG systems, GPT integrations, and internal tools for companies in Kazakhstan. The work has to fit local reality: Kazakh, Russian, and English in the same workflow, mixed-language chats, shala Kazakh patterns, WhatsApp, Telegram, CRM, and human escalation when the answer matters.
— 01 / TASKS
Useful AI starts with the workflow. We map where the customer writes, who answers, where the data lives, and when the conversation should move to a person.
An agent handles questions in Kazakh, Russian, English, and mixed messages.
Common replies go out faster, while sensitive cases reach an operator with context.
A RAG system searches policies, PDFs, sheets, amoCRM, Bitrix24, or internal systems.
Staff get an answer with a source instead of piecing it together from five tabs.
AI extracts name, city, language, product, urgency, and next steps from real conversations.
Managers get a usable CRM card even when the customer switches languages mid-chat.
We define when AI must stop: complaints, payments, legal risk, VIP customers, or low-confidence answers.
The team keeps control of conversations where mistakes are expensive.
Dashboards for statuses, errors, answer quality, manual reviews, and disputed chats.
Managers can see what happens after launch, not only the demo version.
Data extraction, version comparison, draft replies, contract checks, and search across instructions.
Legal, HR, and operations teams spend less time copying text by hand.
— 02 / FIT
A ready-made tool is fine for personal work. In Kazakhstan, business use gets specific fast: several languages, local CRM habits, messengers instead of ticketing systems, access rules, and staff who need to understand why AI answered the way it did.
— 03 / PROCESS
We inspect real tickets, documents, spreadsheets, and access rules.
We define where AI replies, where it acts, and where a human stays in the loop.
We build a working first version against samples from your actual workflow.
We connect CRM, messengers, databases, documents, or internal APIs.
We test on real dialogs, questions, and files, not just friendly demo prompts.
We put the system into work with clear roles, logs, and control points.
We review wrong answers, edge cases, escalations, and user behavior.
We improve scenarios after launch, once real usage starts showing the truth.
— 04 / WORK
This is not a logo wall. These projects show similar systems: agents, RAG, support workflows, internal tools, and integrations.
An AI HR agent for a Kazakhstani retail chain: candidate screening, internal knowledge, vacancy fit, and recruiter workflows.
An AI assistant for automotive operations: cars, service, orders, part compatibility, and internal knowledge across several data sources.
An AI support agent for one of the largest running events in Central Asia, answering participant questions and routing edge cases.
— 05 / INTEGRATIONS
In Kazakhstan, AI projects often depend on the CRM, messengers, and messy file storage. We check the source of truth, available APIs, data ownership, and how updates will reach the system.
— 06 / TIMELINE
2-3 business days when sample data and a process owner are available.
1-2 weeks for a narrow scenario with a limited integration set.
3-6 weeks when the system needs real integrations and team access.
Timeline depends on integrations, data quality, and security requirements.
— 07 / PRICING
Pricing depends on integrations, data quality, access roles, testing scope, and infrastructure requirements. Each stage is paid separately.
A paid review of the task, data, risks, and first sensible scope.
We test the scenario on a small data set before debating it in theory.
We build a working version with UI, integrations, and basic quality control.
We harden the system for access control, logs, operations, and support.
We monitor quality, fix issues, and add new scenarios after launch.
— 08 / azamat.ai
— 08 / FAQ
Yes. We start with real conversations and look at how people actually write: formal Kazakh, Russian, shala Kazakh, transliteration, typos, and short voice-message transcripts. Then we design the answers and tests.
Yes, if there is a reliable integration path: API, webhooks, export, or middleware. Early on, we check limits, access rights, message templates, and the source of truth.
A narrow workflow usually takes 3-6 weeks. If the first release needs several languages, CRM, roles, security, and a review panel, we scope production separately.
The most useful inputs are 30-100 real chats, sample documents, a list of systems, staff roles, and escalation rules. The knowledge base does not need to be perfect.
It depends on integrations, data quality, languages, security requirements, and testing depth. We usually start with discovery so the first stage can be estimated honestly.
— 09 / LINKS
Have a workflow where AI needs to understand the local language of business, not textbook examples from the internet? Send the task, systems, and a few real chats or documents. We will suggest a sensible first stage.