AI literacy for leadership
We explain what models can do, where they fail, how to evaluate AI ideas, and which questions leaders should ask.
Leaders make calmer decisions and avoid buying AI because the demo looked impressive.
Corporate AI training
We run practical AI training for leadership, operations, and teams who need to use models at work, not sit through another future-of-AI talk. The session uses company examples: emails, tickets, reports, policies, spreadsheets, CRM scenarios, and internal documents.
— 01 / TASKS
The program is built around your work. First we learn where the team already uses ChatGPT or other models, where the risks are, and where AI can remove manual effort quickly.
We explain what models can do, where they fail, how to evaluate AI ideas, and which questions leaders should ask.
Leaders make calmer decisions and avoid buying AI because the demo looked impressive.
Teams practice on real materials: emails, reports, ticket analysis, document drafts, meeting prep, and internal notes.
Employees leave with techniques they can use the same day.
We look at where models can classify, check, summarize, search, and prepare the next step in a workflow.
The team sees practical AI inside its own process, not a generic tool tour.
We define what data can go into models, what must stay out, when human review is required, and how outputs should be stored.
The company gets a clear safety baseline instead of rumors and blanket bans.
Participants work with anonymized or approved company materials instead of internet exercises.
The session leaves behind templates, scenarios, and pilot ideas.
We sort tasks into what the team can handle with skill, what needs a GPT workflow, and what deserves an integration or agent.
The team knows what to do itself and what should become a separate project.
— 02 / FIT
This format fits companies where AI has already entered daily work but still feels messy: one person writes strong prompts, another pastes sensitive data into a public chat, someone else expects full automation next month.
— 03 / PROCESS
We inspect real tickets, documents, spreadsheets, and access rules.
We define where AI replies, where it acts, and where a human stays in the loop.
We build a working first version against samples from your actual workflow.
We connect CRM, messengers, databases, documents, or internal APIs.
We test on real dialogs, questions, and files, not just friendly demo prompts.
We put the system into work with clear roles, logs, and control points.
We review wrong answers, edge cases, escalations, and user behavior.
We improve scenarios after launch, once real usage starts showing the truth.
— 04 / WORK
We use real types of work to explain the difference between personal AI skill and product-grade systems: HR agents, RAG over documents, communities, events, and internal tools.
A two-day applied AI program for Kazatomprom teams: ChatGPT basics, meeting analysis, business writing, reporting anomalies, counterparty checks, sanctions risks, and transaction analysis.
An AI briefing for KEGOC on generative AI, ChatGPT, productivity, infrastructure monitoring, grid optimization, and practical use inside an energy company.
A 2024 foundations workshop for Astana Group, built at the point when generative AI had moved from headlines into boardroom questions, but most teams still needed a practical way to use it at work.
A 2024 AI foundations session for Kusto Group leaders: a calm, business-first briefing on what generative AI can support, what it cannot own, and how to start without confusing a demo with implementation.
A May 22, 2026 talk for Parasat Business Club about AI as a CEO working layer: idea pressure-tests, financial thinking, messy inputs, company knowledge, agents, and sharper tasks for a team.
— 05 / INTEGRATIONS
The training does not connect every system on day one, but we show where AI can sit next to CRM, WhatsApp, Telegram, Google Sheets, documents, and internal APIs.
— 06 / DATA
We discuss internal AI usage rules directly: which data should not go into public models, how outputs should be checked, and where a human must stay responsible.
— 07 / TIMELINE
2-3 business days when sample data and a process owner are available.
1-2 weeks for a narrow scenario with a limited integration set.
3-6 weeks when the system needs real integrations and team access.
Timeline depends on integrations, data quality, and security requirements.
— 08 / PRICING
Pricing depends on integrations, data quality, access roles, testing scope, and infrastructure requirements. Each stage is paid separately.
A paid review of the task, data, risks, and first sensible scope.
We test the scenario on a small data set before debating it in theory.
We build a working version with UI, integrations, and basic quality control.
We harden the system for access control, logs, operations, and support.
We monitor quality, fix issues, and add new scenarios after launch.
— 09 / azamat.ai
— 09 / FAQ
A focused intro session is usually 2-4 hours. For leadership and operations, separate 2-hour workshops often work better than one large mixed session.
Yes. That is the best format. We use anonymized or approved materials: tickets, emails, instructions, reports, spreadsheets, and policies.
We start with practical LLM work: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or your corporate tools. Then we show where RAG, integrations, and AI agents become necessary.
No. Most tracks only require people to understand their own work. Technical depth is added for IT, product, or analytics teams.
Yes. We can prepare a short working document: what is allowed, what is restricted, which data must stay out, and when human review is required.
— 10 / LINKS
Tell us which team needs training, what tools employees already use, and which examples we can work through. We will suggest a session format built around your actual work.